• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer

Red River Valley Amateur Radio Club

Amateur Radio in and around the Red River Valley Area of Northeast Texas

  • Home
  • About
    • Contact Us
    • Leadership
  • Membership
    • Member Login
    • The Benefits of Membership
    • Join Us/Renew
    • Profile
    • Member Directory
    • Logout
  • Forums
  • Sponsor
  • Search
  • Ham News
  • History
    • Honor Roll
    • Silent Key
    • Club History
    • Storm Chase 3/25/2019
    • February 2019 Meeting
    • Field Day
      • Field Day 2019
      • Field Day 2005
  • Education/Testing
    • Want to become a ham?
    • Testing – ARRL Volunteer Examiner Administered
    • Propagation
    • Current DX Spots
    • APRS® Messaging System
  • Library
    • Meeting Minutes
    • “Unofficial” Call Sign List
    • RRVARC Net Call Up Script
    • Manuals – Operating, Instruction, Literature, Spec Sheets, etc.
    • Band Plan Illustrations
    • Cross Band Repeater Operation – Charles Penry (WA5VHU) – Recommended Best Practices
    • How to obtain an official copy of your FCC license
    • Governing Documents – Approved
    • Club Reports and Recurring Obligations
    • Governance Project
    • RRVARC-WB5RDD INVENTORY LIST
  • Club Repeaters
  • Shop
  • Officers Only
    • Media Contacts
    • Treasurer’s Reports
    • Texas Required Filings
    • Membership Applications
    • Website Management
    • Website Updating – Tips – Tricks
    • Cellular Hot Spots
Home » Digital Knowledge » Meshtastic for EmComm on VHF/UHF – Off-Grid Texting Mesh Networks » Reply To: Meshtastic for EmComm on VHF/UHF – Off-Grid Texting Mesh Networks

Reply To: Meshtastic for EmComm on VHF/UHF – Off-Grid Texting Mesh Networks

May 24, 2026 at 11:41 am #48569
Phillip BeallPhillip Beall
Keymaster

    All,

    In my previous post I mentioned I was doing some preliminary range modeling — this post covers exactly that.

    I started out thinking like a typical ham — high is good, higher is better.  But from my experience with the Club and our repeaters, I know that getting antennas significantly higher than head height is really hard.  You run into change of management issues, unrealistic insurance requirements for climbers, and difficulty even securing a climber.  It’s 100% a PITA.

    So, scratching my chin and working with Matthew Murphy (KF5NRU), I asked him to run some different configurations in the modeling tool.  For sake of argument, we started with hypothetical devices at his tower location and the Lamar County Courthouse (119 N Main) at 50 feet elevation.  Here’s the visual depiction of that simulation:

    Center-to-center of the blue areas is a little under 7.5 miles.  And when I zoomed in on that image, the transparency wasn’t perfect, but I could make out the loop.  Here are two closer images — one without my red line and one with it.  The red line traces just outside the loop to help it stand out:

    Wow… I was not expecting that.  The model shows that a single device at the courthouse at 50′ would cover the entire area inside the loop.  That’s a lunchbox-sized unit for under $100, solar-charged and autonomous.

    Now, let me temper this — I do not believe one $100 device will magically cover the whole area in real life.  This is just one model we’re looking at.  There are other tools and many variables we can adjust.

    My real point is this: Rather than relying on one high-up device at the courthouse, if we sprinkle nodes around the Paris area (for example at Club members’ homes) at more reasonable heights, we can still achieve excellent coverage.  Matt and I then modeled 3 meters (about 9–10 feet) and here’s the result:

    As you can see, the lower height reduces the range, but not enough to kill the idea.  Dispersing a number of nodes at lower, easier-to-achieve heights is much more practical, faster to deploy, and adds redundancy.  No single point of failure.

    It’s as simple as asking: “Who’s willing to buy one and put it at their house?”  If we get a handful of people spread out across the area, they can mount them on a roof, shop roof, tower leg, or whatever they have available — all at ladder height.

    As time allows, I’ll start modeling where Club members live to figure out optimal node placement — minimizing the number needed while maximizing coverage.  I’ll probably run most of these at 3 meters (10 feet) just to keep it realistic.  Of course, if anyone can go higher than 10 feet, even better!

    73 Phillip Beall (W5EBC)

    • This reply was modified 2 weeks, 1 day ago by Phillip BeallPhillip Beall. Reason: Realigned a couple of images to center

    Footer

    Who We Are

    Red River Valley Amateur Radio Club (RRVARC) is a licensed FCC radio operator (WB5RDD) and an affiliate of the American Radio Relay League (ARRL) – The National Association for Amateur Radio®.

    Club members – hams – are persons interested in amateur radio operations and public service. The Club and its members participate in public service events such as the Tour de Paris, Field Day and educational activities, as well as during emergency preparedness activations.

    Non-Profit Organization

    The RRVARC is a 501(c)3 tax-exempt organization.

    Where We Meet

    The Red River Valley Amateur Radio Club meets at Paris Municipal Court (2910 Clarksville St, Paris, TX 75460) usually on the 4th Saturday of each month.

    Note: Special events like Field Day and some November and December meetings are excepted.  Check the events calendar for special location, dates and time.

    Website contents and logo Copyright Red River Valley Amateur Radio Club (RRVARC). Please email the webmaster (admin@rrvarc.org) with additional content or corrections.